Why let baby foreskins go to waste is what I always say.
Why human love infant genital mutilation so much?
It’s far from universally loved.
I’m not sure what the green is vs the red. I would assume African cultures don’t support it mostly because it seems unlikely that they developed the same arbitrary (religious) surgery. That would however imply that Europe is a lot more supportive of circumcision than I would have expected. Either way I’m surprised.
What do you think are the major religions in the continent of Africa? Traditional religions take up less than 10% of religious belief. Yes, less than 10% for all of them combined
That’s fair. I forgot that we colonized them a little bit less than respectfully.
It’s mostly majority Muslim countries in red with the exception of the Philippines, South Korea, and the US
Red is 90–100% circumcised. Green is 0–9%.
Wow, I’m surprised at how much it skews eastwards in the US.
Could you imagine a baby foreskin fanny pack? That way it could hurt everyone involved!
Baby foreskin facials are so wasteful. Why smear them on your face once and discard them when you can make a leather thong from them for years of use?
Thoughts like this are likely how The Church of Euthanasia got started.
Yes
because of the meat industry, i think its more ethical to use leather than let it go to waste. it lasts a long time and can replace a lot of other textiles that would need to be replaced more.
People need to realize this more.
Its true, but on the flipside if you gave the meat industry less ways to recoup cost of “waste” then it may push meat prices higher and move people to plant based diets, thus removing need for amount of animals
And the good thing is, when demand for (human) leather is higher than supply, people will just breed some more humans, keep them on farms, use their labor and sell their leather. With nothing going to waste, just the beautiful circle of life.
We’ve gotten quite efficient at doing that so there’s plenty opportunity to have more jobs, make a profit and to provide a product at an affordable price point, at the same time, all with human leather farms. Just have to compromise on welfare and sustainability step by step for more profit, but humans are already really great at ignoring such things when it’s advantageous to them, so most won’t ask any pesky questions anyways. We just have to normalize human leather (from factory farms) and everything will be great.
Yeah, just like we should eat more meat. Meat is just a waste product of the leather industry! Eating meat helps stop climate change because then we dont need to eat plants that are mono culture that use up space of trees.
If people have good tattoos, the skin the tattoo is on should be preserved at death and framed. For family to enjoy.
Didn’t expect to meet Fukushi Masaichi here.
Well, the human can consent, so that would make it perfectly ethical if they do.
this site uses cookies. To continue, you must agree to the terms and conditions. By hitting agree, you agree to the following.
- blah
- blah blah
- blah
- you consent to being turned in to a hat
- blah
agree?
Blindly hits “Agree”.
They consented when they tried to raid me.
It’s Rimworld, so making hats out of guests is kind of mandatory.
That’s so much leather tho
Digging graves takes time and space. Butchering gives resources. You do the math.
In Anomaly I feed them all to my Harbinger Trees for more bioferrite!
But if I had any cannibals, or my Ideoligion didn’t dislike corpses so much, I would probably do things differently.
Humans. They can consent.
We already kill cows to eat them. Wearing their skin is just using more of their material.
Yeah exactly. People dont realize that leather is a byproduct of the meat industry. Most of the cost is in tanning and preparing it.
So trust me, there is no shortage of skin to make leather
Except it’s rarely the same cows
Cut/tan/stain/stamp the rich!
Assuming it’s involuntary either way, cows.
There’s no shortage of alternatives, though.
Yes!
Gotta make it a tenet of your tribe’s religion.
Depends on the cow and the human.
If a cow is a dick and harming other cows, moral.
If the human lives a modest life and pursues charitable acts to make themself happy, immoral.
I feel like if a child with a similar level of cognition as the cow harms other children, most people will say they have no moral agency yet, and will still see harvesting their leather as immoral.
There are two ways to resolve that inconsistency…
Finally, humane child slaughter
From the pov of a human or a cow?
Cow leather is more moral in my pov
Or is it about sourcing it from them after their natural death?
Even then cow leather seems more moralWhat do you base that on? A cow can’t consent to this.
